The EU’s Recovery and Resilience Facility: Experience and Lessons for the Next Multiannual Financial Framework

The EU’s Recovery and Resilience Facility: Experience and Lessons for the Next Multiannual Financial Framework
READ MORE...
Volume/Issue: Volume 2026 Issue 114
Publication date: June 2026
ISBN: 9798229048774
$20.00
Add to Cart by clicking price of the language and format you'd like to purchase
Available Languages and Formats
Paperback
PDF
ePub
English
Prices in red indicate formats that are not yet available but are forthcoming.
Topics covered in this book

This title contains information about the following subjects. Click on a subject if you would like to see other titles with the same subjects.

Finance , Investments and Securities-General , Economics- Macroeconomics , Public Finance , Recovery and Resilience Facility , NextGenerationEU , EU policies , Loans , Securities markets , Gross fixed investment , Europe , Southern Europe

Summary

This paper takes stock of the Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF)’s economic impact as implementation enters its final phase and draws lessons for the design of the next EU Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF). Using sectoral and cross-country data, the paper finds that the RRF provided a short term demand boost, supporting employment and output growth—especially in countries with large allocations—while a substantial share of its growth impact is expected to materialize as absorption accelerates. Unprecedented joint EU level borrowing is found to have contributed to stabilizing sovereign debt markets and improving prospects for EU bonds as safe assets. Finally, the RRF’s performance based conditionality through improved national ownership has supported reform implementation in some member states. At the same time, challenges around the pace of funds absorption remain as implementation is still ramping up and the overall macroeconomic impact will ultimately depend on how effectively the RRF funds are utilized. Plan overambition and complexity, administrative capacity limits, and absorption bottlenecks have slowed disbursement in several member states, while the predominance of output based milestones and targets has limited the framework’s focus on results.